BCMR Case

I, Chauncey L. Robinson, will allow you to be able to review documented evidence of deprivation of my due process rights and civil rights by the United States Department of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency which operates under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense. I served my country in the United States Military at Fort Leonard Wood, Mo, from January 7, 1992 thru July 7, 1992. During my active duty military service, I was injured and requested both a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), which I was deprived of my due process rights to be medically examined by either or both of those two boards. And also my request for hearings concerning the issues of deprivation of both (MEB) & (PEB), while I was still on active duty. Therefore when I received an honorable discharge, once I got home and learned of a stigmatizing separation code in my DD Form 214, I filed a claim with the U.S. Department of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency for my military retirement and correction to my DD Form 214, SPN code, which said I was PREGNANT.

Here’s, Chauncey L. Robinson’s Military DD Form 214, February 10, 2011: Military Letter & DD Form 214, February 10, 2011

I continued to file for reconsideration and research on the records and military discharge issues. Military Record Correction Boards And Their Judicial Review, June 11, 2010, Basics Of Discharge Upgrade Information 

The following links are documents about my 26 year old domestic warfare to receive my due process rights and civil rights and correction to my DD Form 214. Even after receiving an honorable discharge in July 1992, which as mentioned above I was deprived of my due process rights and civil rights: Department Of The Army, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, September 15, 1994, Department Of The Army, Office Of The Assistant Secretary, January 3, 1997, Department Of The Army, Board For Correction Of Military Records & Congressman Michael R. McNULTY, January 15, 1997, Department Of The Army, Board For Correction Of Military Records, January 8, 1997, Department of The Army, Board For Correction Of Military Records, January 8, 1997, Department Of The Army, Office Of The Assistant Secretary, January 22, 1998, Department Of The Army, Board for Correcction Of Military records, February 10, 1998, Congressman Michael R. McNULTY, Chief Of Legislative Liaison Congressional Inquiry Division, March 20 & 25, 1998, Department Of The Army, Board For Correction Of Military Records, August 19, 1999 

Therefore have been several new policy changes for the benefit of Veterans that procedural violations due to bad paper military discharges, such as follows: September 3, 2014, the Secretary Of Defense issued a Memorandum For Secretaries Of the Military Departments concerning military discharges. The new guidance clarifies that the liberal consideration policy includes conditions resulting from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, sexual assault or sexual harassment, said Air Force Lt. Col. Reggie Yager, the acting director of legal policy in the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness: Secretary Of Defense, Memorandum For Secretaries Of The Military Departments, September 3, 2014, DOD Announces New Outreach Efforts to Veterans Regarding Discharges And Military Records, December 30, 2016, Pentagon Expands Policy to Upgrade Vets’ Bad Paper Discharges, DOD Clarifies Liberal Considerations For Veterans’ Discharge Upgrade Requests

Around November 2011, again I submitted the “Lester F. Casey V. The United States, No. 528-80C, May 13, 1985 and Neil Wilhelmus, Plantiff, V. Peter Green, Defendant, Civil Action No. 90-662 (JEB), July 13, 2011, which required correction of the stigmatizing code in  my DD Form 214. Which has been continuously denied and is presently pending before the Department of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency. Even after U.S. Claims Court, Judge Yock ruled in favor Veterans, that records are to be corrected and they’re to receive their benefits for that period of active duty service and voluntary retirement in the pay grade of discharge: Lester F. Casey V. The United States, No. 528-80C., May 13, 1985, Neil C. Wilhelmus, Plantiff, V. Pete Geren, Defendant, Civil Action No. 90-662 (JEB), July 13, 2011, Dpartment Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency, July 19, 2010, Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency, DD Form 149, January 21, 2011, Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency, February 3, 2011, Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency, February 10, 2011, Department of The Army, Congressman Paul Tonko, February 17, 2011, Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency, April 15, 2011, Department Of The Army, Board For Correction Of Military Records, August 4, 2011 

After having filed for reconsideration several times, especially on January 21, 2011, I received a letter dated September 12, 2011, from the Department of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency, which reads as follows on page 2, “In regards to your statement that you received a separation program designator code for pregnancy, you can apply to the ABCMR to correct this specific alleged administrative error which is item 26 (SEPARATION CODE) of your DD Form 214, Certificate of Rlease or Discharge from Active Duty with a separation date of July 7, 1002. To assist you, I have enclosed a copy of DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Records at enclosure 5.” Which I rejected to do so because I already properly filed for correction of my DD Form 214: Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency, Admission To Wrong Doing, September 12, 2011, Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency, November 10, 2011

Around August 2017, policy for military retirement was changed and the change caused me to be eligible for my military retirement, which I filed for reconsideration on August 31, 2017: Application For Military Retirement, August 31, 2017, Senator Tim Kaine’s Privacy Release Authorization, November 9, 2017, Senator Tim Kaine’s, Letter, November 17, 2017, Senator Tim Kaine’s, December 5, 2017, Department of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency, November 30, 2017, Department of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency, April 30, 2018, Senator Tim Kaine’s Letter, October 4, 2018, Department of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency Letter, October 3, 2018, Chauncey Robinson Medical Letter To, Senator Tim Kaine, October 9, 2018, Senator Tim Kaine’s Letter, February 12, 2019, Department of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency, February 6, 2019

For 27 years all I’ve ever heard from both governmental agencies, U.S. Department Of  The Army, Army Review Boards Agency and U.S. Department Of Veterans Affairs, we’re in backlog, we’re short of man power.

The new excuse, I’ve been told as far as January 2019, the U.S. Department Of  The Army, Army Review Boards Agency was suffering a backlog due to last years government shutdown. 

And then I received the following letter from Senator Timothy Kaine’s office concerning a letter of response his office received from the U.S. Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency dated March 27, 2019: Senator Timothy Kaine, Army Review Boards Agency Response To Chauncey Robinson, March 27, 2019

After not receiving any responses from no one about my military retirement, on January 20, 2020, I sent a letter to Senator Timothy Kaine’s office via email, requesting that in his capacity, as a member of the Armed Services Committee to get the Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency to get a final resolution concerning my military retirement case: Senator Timothy Kaine, Chauncey L. Robinson’s Request For Final Resolution, January 20, 2020   

On February 7, 2020, 2020, I received a letter from Senator Timothy Kaine’s office dated February 4, 2020, attached with a letter from the U.S. Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency dated January 21, 2020, which reads as follows in paragraph two: “Case Management Division requested a medical advisory opinion from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) medical staff. The issues presented requires a review with our medical staff, which has a delayed adjudication.” Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency, January 21, 2020 & Senator Timothy Kaine, February 4, 2020

I will doing a follow up letter concerning responding to the Department Of The Army, Army Review Boards Agency letter dated January 21, 2020, concerning paragraph two.

Sincerely,
Chauncey L. Robinson
571-225-4988
pointman1960@icloud.com